docs: resolve both governance gates (OPEN-01, Horizon 2 Phase 0)

OPEN-01 (scholarly-review-log.md): ruled NOT subject to the one-third
cap for an inter-vivos waqf made in health. The existing
FamilyWaqfDesignator logic already applied no health-state cap absent a
marad al-mawt trigger, so no behavior change — only the open-question
framing in the exported deed, InfoPanel copy, on-screen note, and source
comments moved from "open" to "resolved."

Horizon 2 Phase 0 (legal opinion + signed institutional partner
agreement): both now signed. This clears the PRD's gate to begin real
institutional-integration engineering, but that integration hasn't been
built yet — the Claims module (DigitalClaims.svelte, claims.js) still
ships as a local, non-custodial demonstration only, and the pilot banner
is updated to say so precisely rather than implying the module itself
is now production-ready.

Updated README.md and deploy/DEPLOY.md to match.

src/lib/FamilyWaqfDesignator.svelte

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 <script>
-  // Built per explicit user instruction overriding the Horizon 1 PRD §8.5 gate
-  // ("this module does not enter development until... a qualified Shariah advisor's
-  // direct sign-off"). scholarly-review-log.md OPEN-01 remains unresolved — the cap
-  // logic below follows the PRD's literal specification (marad al-mawt only) but the
-  // in-app note is kept honest about the open question rather than presenting
-  // invented certainty, consistent with this project's own stated practice.
+  // Built ahead of the Horizon 1 PRD §8.5 gate ("this module does not enter
+  // development until... a qualified Shariah advisor's direct sign-off"), per
+  // explicit product direction at the time. scholarly-review-log.md OPEN-01 is now
+  // RESOLVED: ruled NOT subject to the one-third cap. The cap logic below already
+  // matched this ruling (marad al-mawt only), so no change was needed here — only
+  // the in-app copy and this comment moved from "open question" to "resolved."
   import { onMount } from 'svelte';
   import { activeFamilyId } from './family.js';
   import { session } from './auth.js';
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@
         ? 'This deed references Perak Waqf Enactment 2015, Section 10(1). Registration with the\nrelevant state waqf authority is required for legal effect — this document alone does\nnot constitute a legally registered waqf.'
         : `This deed references ${jurisdiction}'s waqf enactment where available. Registration\nwith the relevant state waqf authority is required for legal effect — this document\nalone does not constitute a legally registered waqf.`,
       '',
-      'OPEN FIQH QUESTION (see project scholarly-review-log.md, OPEN-01): whether an',
-      'inter-vivos waqf made in health is subject to the same one-third cap as a wasiyyah,',
-      'or is uncapped like hibah, has not received a scholar\'s determination. This draft',
-      'applies no health-state cap unless the marad al-mawt guardrail below was triggered.',
+      'SCHOLARLY RULING (project scholarly-review-log.md, OPEN-01 — resolved): an',
+      'inter-vivos waqf made in health is NOT subject to the one-third cap that applies',
+      'to a wasiyyah; it is uncapped like hibah. This draft applies no health-state cap,',
+      'consistent with that ruling, unless the marad al-mawt guardrail below was triggered.',
       '',
       'DISCLAIMER: Not a fatwa. Not legal advice. Drafting aid only.'
     ];
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
     <InfoPanel
       title="Family Waqf Designator"
       what="A waqf is a permanent endowment — you dedicate an asset (like a piece of land or property) so it can never be sold, and it serves a purpose (usually your family's benefit) forever. Like a hibah, this happens now, while you're alive, so the asset is out of your estate immediately — nothing for a court to process later."
-      how="Choose an asset from your Asset Registry, name a trustee (mutawalli) who will manage it, and decide how the benefit is shared among your family. There's an open religious question about the one-third limit for this instrument — the app explains it plainly rather than pretending there's a single settled answer."
+      how="Choose an asset from your Asset Registry, name a trustee (mutawalli) who will manage it, and decide how the benefit is shared among your family. Scholarly sign-off confirmed this instrument is not subject to the one-third limit that applies to a wasiyyah — the app states that ruling plainly."
       fields={[
         { label: 'Corpus asset', hint: 'The specific asset you\'re dedicating — pick it from your Asset Registry.' },
         { label: 'Mutawalli (trustee)', hint: 'The person who will manage the asset and make sure it\'s used properly.' },
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
     />
   </div>
   <div class="open-note">
-    <strong>Open fiqh question:</strong> whether a healthy-state family waqf is subject to a one-third cap has not received scholarly sign-off (tracked as OPEN-01). This module ships without waiting on that review, per explicit product direction — the exported deed says so plainly rather than presenting invented certainty.
+    <strong>Scholarly ruling (OPEN-01, resolved):</strong> a healthy-state family waqf is <em>not</em> subject to the one-third cap that applies to a wasiyyah. The exported deed states this ruling plainly.
   </div>
   <div class="fast-path-note">This is a fast-path instrument. Once dedicated, this asset is no longer part of your estate — it is not subject to Faraid/probate adjudication at death. Product direction for this build is explicit: keeping assets out of the Faraid/probate queue entirely is the point.</div>
   <p class="sub">Dedicate a specific asset to your family in perpetuity.</p>

src/lib/horizon2/DigitalClaims.svelte

@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
 <script>
-  // Built per explicit user instruction overriding the Horizon 2 PRD's Phase 0 gate.
-  // See claims.js header for the full note. This screen is clearly labeled pre-pilot
-  // throughout — the PRD's own non-goals (§3.2) forbid presenting this as a freely
-  // tradeable security or a live institutional integration, and it is neither.
+  // Originally built ahead of the Horizon 2 PRD's Phase 0 gate; Phase 0 (legal opinion
+  // + signed institutional partner agreement) is now RESOLVED — both are signed. See
+  // claims.js header for the full note. That clears the PRD's gate to begin real
+  // institutional-integration engineering, but no such integration has been built yet,
+  // so this screen remains a structural demonstration only — the PRD's own non-goals
+  // (§3.2) still forbid presenting this as a freely tradeable security or a live
+  // institutional integration, and it still is neither, pending that build.
   import { listClaims, issueClaim, transferClaim, removeClaim } from './claims.js';
   import Disclaimer from '../Disclaimer.svelte';
   import InfoPanel from '../InfoPanel.svelte';
@@ -39,11 +42,12 @@
 <div class="module">
   <div class="pilot-banner">
     <strong>PRE-PILOT DEMONSTRATION — NOT A LIVE PROGRAMME.</strong>
-    Horizon 2 PRD Status: "No engineering work begins until Phase 0 (legal opinion + signed
-    institutional partner agreement) is complete." That confirmation has not been provided in
-    this session. This screen is a structural demonstration of the claim model and its transfer
-    restriction — it issues no real legal claim, moves no real asset, and is not backed by any
-    SPV/trust legal wrapper or institutional partner.
+    Horizon 2 PRD's Phase 0 gate (legal opinion + signed institutional partner agreement)
+    is now resolved — both are signed. That clears the way to build real institutional
+    integration, but it hasn't been built yet. This screen remains a structural
+    demonstration of the claim model and its transfer restriction only — it issues no
+    real legal claim, moves no real asset, and is not yet backed by any SPV/trust legal
+    wrapper or live institutional partner connection.
   </div>
 
   <div class="module-header">

src/lib/horizon2/claims.js

@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
 // Digital Beneficial Claims data model.
-// Built per explicit user instruction overriding Horizon 2 PRD's stated gate:
-// "No engineering work begins until Phase 0 (legal opinion + signed institutional
-// partner agreement) is complete." No evidence Phase 0 is complete — this ships as
-// a local, non-custodial demonstration model only, structurally enforcing the
-// PRD §5.2 transfer restriction (no open market) even though the real legal
-// wrapper (SPV/trust, Horizon 2 PRD §5.1) and institutional integration do not exist
-// yet. Nothing here moves real assets or represents a real legal claim.
+// Originally built ahead of Horizon 2 PRD's stated gate: "No engineering work begins
+// until Phase 0 (legal opinion + signed institutional partner agreement) is
+// complete." Phase 0 is now RESOLVED — both are signed, clearing the way to build
+// the real legal wrapper (SPV/trust, Horizon 2 PRD §5.1) and institutional
+// integration. Neither has been built yet, so this module still ships as a local,
+// non-custodial demonstration only, structurally enforcing the PRD §5.2 transfer
+// restriction (no open market). Nothing here moves real assets or represents a real
+// legal claim until that integration work lands.
 
 import { load, save } from '../storage.js';